American rightoids can't stop coping about how EU is whiter than US.

Therefore they seethe on government papers

As expected, the new NSS paper has sparked a lot of debate, especially among experts and pundits. And yet, simply reading the whole text would be enough to understand that, far from revealing some kind of “major shift,” it’s nothing more than a collection of 4Chan memes thrown onto paper by some groyper intern. This doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be taken seriously at all, but neither should it be taken too much.

In particular, the point that has stirred the most discussion is the claim that “Europe is at risk of civilizational erasure” due to immigration. Beyond the fact the EU has made discreet progress in tackling illegal immigration, but the text sounds like it was written either by someone stuck in 2015 or by someone who can’t just but coping. Why? Let’s check it.

The Cope on data

It’s fairly well-known that, at least according to the rightoidsphere, the level of a country’s “civilization” is measured by the proportion of native white people still living there. So I asked Grok to calculate the percentage of white people in the US and in the EU.

United States
The most recent U.S. Census Bureau data from the 2024 American Community Survey estimates that **57.5%** of the U.S. population identifies as non-Hispanic White (often referred to as “white” in demographic contexts). This figure represents approximately 195.5 million people out of a total population of about 340 million. If including those who identify as White alone or in combination with other races (e.g., multiracial individuals), the share rises to around 72%, but the non-Hispanic White percentage is the standard metric for majority-White population comparisons.

This marks a continued decline from 59.5% in 2020, driven by lower birth rates, an aging population, and higher growth among Hispanic, Asian, and multiracial groups.

European Union
The European Union (EU-27) does not officially collect or report data on race or ethnicity due to legal restrictions in many member states (e.g., France prohibits such censuses). As a result, precise figures for “white” people—typically defined as those of European ethnic descent—are estimates based on indirect indicators like country of birth, citizenship, and migration data from Eurostat and national statistics.

Based on 2024 estimates, **approximately 82-88%** of the EU’s 449 million residents are considered white (of European origin). This equates to roughly 368-395 million people. The range accounts for variations in methodology:
- About 90.1% of the population is EU-born (including intra-EU migrants, who are overwhelmingly white).
- Non-EU-born residents make up 9.9% (44.7 million), many from non-European regions (e.g., Africa, Asia, Middle East), though some intra-EU movement and naturalization adjust the figure downward.

The estimate reflects low immigration-driven diversity (foreign-born: ~23% total, but mostly European), with higher shares of non-white populations in countries like Germany (15-20% non-white) and Sweden (15-20%), compared to more homogeneous nations like Poland (<5%)

Grok has also been very kind to sum up everything on chart:

At this point, some will reply that the concerns expressed by the U.S. government aren’t really about the risk of racial erosion, but rather cultural erosion linked to Islamic immigration. This is the interpretation offered by some liberal pundits, like Noah Smith — but we’ll get back to that later.

So I ran an experiment. I asked Grok for the percentage of Muslims living in Europe and in Israel. Why Israel, specifically? Anyone familiar with this blog knows it doesn’t have much sympathy for anti-Zionism or for any form of antisemitism, whether low-IQ or “high-IQ” (if such a thing even exists). But the point is that countries like Israel have always been framed by American conservatives as the best U.S. ally in the world, paired with the hasbarist narrative of being “a stronghold against Islamization of Western countries.”
Aha, isn’t it? Well, let’s give a look.

Israel is risking civilizational erasure!

Here too, the data provided by Grok give us some interesting insights. Europe as a whole—not just EU countries—has around 46 million Muslims, which in absolute terms may seem like a lot. But Europe is a continent of about 400 million people, so in relative terms the share of the Muslim population drops to 6% (notice those numbers from Russia—the “based”, “Christian” and “whitepilled” country rightoids love so much. Interesting, isn’t it?)

On the other hand, Israel has about 1.8 million Muslims within its territory, which in absolute terms sounds like peanuts, but considering that Israel is a small country with just under 10 million inhabitants, in relative terms we are talking about as much as 18% of the whole population.

It should also be noted that, unlike in Europe, the vast majority of Muslims in Israel are not immigrants but native to the land. Considering also their fertility rate is almost equal to that of Israeli Jews (although declining in recent years), one can easily argue that Israel is in a much more critical position than the EU in terms of the risk of “civilizational erasure,” for the simple reason that while in Europe Muslim immigrants can always be re-migrated (and there are already attempts in this regard), Israel does not have this option (as others more expert than me have already explained elsewhere).

And yet no one seems to mention these controversial data, which certainly do not give a flattering image of a country whose hasbara propaganda portrays it as “the bastion against Islamization.” You don’t hear it from liberals (for obvious reasons), you don’t hear it from Christian Zionists (for their own obvious reasons), but you don’t even hear it from anti-zionist populists like Tucker Carlson or from self-declared “high-IQ antisemites” like Nick Fuentes, even though the latter would have every interest in exploiting any argument to cast the mephitic “Zionist lobby” in a bad light¹.

Rightoid ambivalence makes difficult to take them seriously

In his latest dramatic essay Noah Smith wrote:

The American right — i.e., the people now in charge of the country — do not care intrinsically about democracy, or about allyship, or about NATO, or about the European project. They care about “Western Civilization”. Unless Europe expels Muslim immigrants en masse and starts talking about its Christian heritage, the Republican Party is unlikely to lift a hand to help Europe with any of its problems.

I’m surprised how a smart guy like Smith seems to believe “the people now in charge of the country” are acting according to clear and steadfast principles and not like they are competing to be the crowned as the Basedest among the Basedest in the Based Ritual award.

Let’s say the Republican Party is unlikely to lift a hand to help anyone besides what they do, except maybe if they put invest some billion into Trump pockets local US business. There are, in fact, several EU countries that have done exactly what Smith suggests, and without needing to wait for Trump: Poland is the most vivid example, they started to wage a hardline on immigration since 2015, well before MAGA was a thing, and has also been one the most islamophobe countries in EU. But Poland is also one of the most anti-Russian countries in Europe, and one of the most pro-Ukraine since the war started in 2022 when PIS was still in power. And yet a lot of MAGA people used to spew racist insults against the Poles, accusing them of wanting to drag the USA into WW3 and other bullshit².

As with regard to American right’s concerns about Islamic immigration and its consequences, it should be emphasized that American rightoids have over the last few years developed a rather ambiguous position toward Islam.

Perhaps Smith doesn’t remember, or maybe he missed it³, but from around 2021 to 2023 a recurring meme within the rightoid sphere was the so-called “Islamo-Christian” alliance against woke and feminism. An alliance that was not only pushed by groypers or some Appalachian from Karachi, but was even starting to gain traction among more mainstream factions.

In light of the above, some questions arise: Why should Europeans be concerned to what American rightoids believes about their civilization, especially since they have proved day by day to be congenital flip-floppers? Tucker Carlson express concern about UK turning a minority white country first, just to declare to feel closer to a Paki driver than a white guy working for mainstream media one second later. Nick Fuentes passed the entire summer season to accuse JD Vance to be a fake white nationalist married with an Indian, and then he defends muslims as based and trad, further affirming all the hate against them is manufactured by Jews.

So sorry Smith, I don’t know what EU politicians think, but personally I found difficult to accept any advice by an administration of serial grifters, whose true philosophy is not to judge people by the color of their skin or because of their religion, but by the amount luxury jets they are willing to offer to the big boss⁴.

If the EU as a whole were to decide to expel all Muslims, or even to implement a Jim Crow–style system across all member states, that would be solely for of domestic politics reasons; surely not to satisfy some groyper intern in Washington.

Conclusion

Discussions about civilizational stability can be divided into two strands: those who believe that ethnic homogeneity outweighs cultural homogeneity, and vice versa.
The data show that Europe has a much higher level of ethnic homogeneity than the United States.
If we instead consider civilizational stability in terms of culture and religion, here too—contrary to the mainstream narrative—Europe is in a much better position than certain countries regarded as “outposts of the West.”
This does not mean that everything is fine, but neither we are in a pitch-black scenario claimed by certain propagandists and some neurotic libs.

It is therefore not far from reality to assume that whoever wrote that document was under copium. It’s understandable: in America so called “white supremacy” died in 2024⁵, and it is unlikely to return. All that remains is projection as a form of emotional consolation. In any case, rightoids must decide:

Either Europe is at risk of civilizational erasure because of their 6% muslim population or Israel with their 18% muslim population is a bastion against Islamization.

Either muslims are a threat against western civilization or they are allies against woke degeneracy.

After they have sorted out and pushed white population >65%⁶, they will be entitled to give lessons about “civilizational erasure”.

1. Probably because of ignorance, or perhaps because they don’t want to alienate their fans from Qatar and Pakistan. But if I were an “high IQ anti-Zionist” who want to persuade my moderate friends to drop their support for Israel, I would emphasize the fact that a country with almost 20% of Moors is not very credible when it claims to being fighting to save the west from the very same Moors.

2. Groypers even went further, posting memes defending Bolshevism because during communist occupation there was no gay pride in Warsaw.

3. I think the problem with many liberal pundits like Smith and others is that they lack enough expertise to understand rightoid psychology. That’s why I think they should follow more people like Richard Hanania and Richard Spencer, who can affirm a certain grade of expertise on the subject.

4. Libs have often accused the Trump administration (I and II) of being a “racist” administration. In reality, they are only interested in pocketing as many bribes as possible, which in a way makes them worse than racists. Because if they were actually racists at least they would be more intellectually honest.

5. We can symbolically trace the death of white supremacism in America to Summer 2024, when former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke endorsed the Judeo-Marxist Jill Stein because of her strong position against Israel’s genocide in Gaza.

6. Without statistic tricks, of course, like classifing all Latino population from a day to another as whites. But I trust Steven Miller to stay vigilant.